Source of Statements about Extensibility of data gathering (without imported statements)
Properties
History
Community
Source
You have no permissions to edit this model.
Saving has been disabled.
# Exported with the Erfurt API - http://aksw.org/Projects/Erfurt @base
. @prefix dct:
. @prefix ns0:
. @prefix ns1:
. @prefix ns2:
. @prefix ns3:
. @prefix ontology1288790966584:
. @prefix ontowiki_wikipage:
. @prefix owl2xml:
. @prefix owl:
. @prefix rdf:
. @prefix rdfs:
. @prefix sadocontology1:
. @prefix sioc:
. @prefix sioct:
. @prefix sysconf:
. @prefix uva-sa-ontology:
. @prefix view:
. @prefix xsd:
. sadocontology1:Extensibility_of_data_sources sadocontology1:addressed_by sadocontology1:Distribution_of_data_schema_for_tool_types, sadocontology1:Method_of_data_gathering, sadocontology1:Support_tool_switch, sadocontology1:data_extraction_technique_-_push_or_pull, sadocontology1:data_sources_of_application_need_to_be_extensible ; sadocontology1:description """By request of the stakeholders, the data sources of the application need to be extensible. One of the main concerns of the stakeholders was that they like to experiment with different tools. At the moment they might use a specific tool, but if another, better tool arises, there is a large probability that they are going to experiment with it. The stakeholders indicated that they want to use the latest tools and techniques to use with their projects. If we look at the history of the company of the stakeholders, we see that they indeed switch their tools once in a while. However, they actually switch tools, and don’t add tools which they didn’t use before. To double check, we asked the stakeholders how they foresee the use of tools in the future. They indeed verified that when they introduce a new tool, it is often to replace existing tools and not to introduce a completely new tool. They also indicated that there currently isn’t a need to introduce a completely new tool into the organization.""" ; sadocontology1:is_concern_of sadocontology1:Previous ; sadocontology1:knowledge_is_located_in
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
; sadocontology1:name "Extensibility of data gathering" ; sadocontology1:realized_by sadocontology1:Scheduler, sadocontology1:relational_database ; sadocontology1:related_to sadocontology1:Flexibility, sadocontology1:Maintainability, sadocontology1:Transformation_of_gathered_data ; sadocontology1:results_in sadocontology1:Scheduler ; a sadocontology1:Concern, sadocontology1:Non_functional_requirement, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Extensibility of data gathering" .
# Exported with the Erfurt API - http://aksw.org/Projects/Erfurt @base
. @prefix dct:
. @prefix ns0:
. @prefix ns1:
. @prefix ns2:
. @prefix ns3:
. @prefix ontology1288790966584:
. @prefix ontowiki_wikipage:
. @prefix owl2xml:
. @prefix owl:
. @prefix rdf:
. @prefix rdfs:
. @prefix sadocontology1:
. @prefix sioc:
. @prefix sioct:
. @prefix sysconf:
. @prefix uva-sa-ontology:
. @prefix view:
. @prefix xsd:
. sadocontology1:Extensibility_of_data_sources sadocontology1:addressed_by sadocontology1:Distribution_of_data_schema_for_tool_types, sadocontology1:Method_of_data_gathering, sadocontology1:Support_tool_switch, sadocontology1:data_extraction_technique_-_push_or_pull, sadocontology1:data_sources_of_application_need_to_be_extensible ; sadocontology1:description """By request of the stakeholders, the data sources of the application need to be extensible. One of the main concerns of the stakeholders was that they like to experiment with different tools. At the moment they might use a specific tool, but if another, better tool arises, there is a large probability that they are going to experiment with it. The stakeholders indicated that they want to use the latest tools and techniques to use with their projects. If we look at the history of the company of the stakeholders, we see that they indeed switch their tools once in a while. However, they actually switch tools, and don’t add tools which they didn’t use before. To double check, we asked the stakeholders how they foresee the use of tools in the future. They indeed verified that when they introduce a new tool, it is often to replace existing tools and not to introduce a completely new tool. They also indicated that there currently isn’t a need to introduce a completely new tool into the organization.""" ; sadocontology1:is_concern_of sadocontology1:Previous ; sadocontology1:knowledge_is_located_in
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
; sadocontology1:name "Extensibility of data gathering" ; sadocontology1:realized_by sadocontology1:Scheduler, sadocontology1:relational_database ; sadocontology1:related_to sadocontology1:Flexibility, sadocontology1:Maintainability, sadocontology1:Transformation_of_gathered_data ; sadocontology1:results_in sadocontology1:Scheduler ; a sadocontology1:Concern, sadocontology1:Non_functional_requirement, owl:NamedIndividual ; rdfs:label "Extensibility of data gathering" .
OntoWiki
Search for Resources
User
Register New User
Extras
SPARQL Query Editor
News
Help
Documentation
Bug Report
Version Info
About
Knowledge Bases
Architecture Knowledge Domain Ontology
View
Show Hidden Knowledge Bases
Navigation
Search in Navigation
View
Number of Elements
10
20
30
Toggle Elements
Hidden Elements
Empty Elements
Implicit Elements
Reset Navigation
Type
Classes
Properties
SKOS
Groups
Login
Local
OpenID
FOAF+SSL
Username
Password
Remember me
Login
Register
OpenID
Login
Register
Login
Register